| Subject: RAM |
| Group: microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance |
| Date: 9/2/2008 3:07:20 AM |
| From: =?Utf-8?B?RHVsY2U=?= [Email Address Protection] |
Hello I hope you can help me with an issue : My PC is Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q9450 2.66GHz windows Vista Ultimate 32 bits 8,00GB ram. My brother wants my 2 2GB memory dim because he says 32 bits systems don't recognize RAM over 4GB. The system says 8GB, and the motherboard Asus P5E CHIPSET X38 supports 8GB. Is he right and I have 4 more GB Ram for nothing, or is the ram ayhow helpfull and I showld keep it as it is ? Thankx Maria Dulce |
| Back |
| Subject: Re: RAM |
| Group: microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance |
| Date: 9/2/2008 10:13:07 AM |
| From: "Victek" [Email Address Protection] |
> Hello > I hope you can help me with an issue : > My PC is Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q9450 2.66GHz windows Vista Ultimate 32 > bits 8,00GB ram. My brother wants my 2 2GB memory dim because he says 32 > bits systems don't recognize RAM over 4GB. > The system says 8GB, and the motherboard Asus > P5E CHIPSET X38 supports 8GB. Is he right and I have 4 more GB Ram for > nothing, or is the ram ayhow helpfull and I showld keep it as it is ? > > Thankx > > Maria Dulce > Unfortunately 4 gigs is the maximum that a 32-bit OS can use. In fact, because some of the address spaces are reserved for hardware (such as the ram on the video card) the OS actually only has 3.X gigs available to it. Try reducing the ram to four gigs and observe your PC's performance - you should not see any difference. 64-bit OS's exist, but there are still compatibility issues. They are the future though, so you're brother may have to return the ram in a year or two <g>. |
| Back |
| Subject: Re: RAM |
| Group: microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance |
| Date: 9/2/2008 11:51:28 AM |
| From: "Mark H" [Email Address Protection] |
I, and probably many others, would have to say Vista x64 has come a long way on the compatibility issue. I have yet to run into a problem with x64 compatibility since Vista was released. "Victek" <Victek@invalid.invalid> wrote in message news:81C41370-6FCC-4C36-8BA0-2718717A1669@microsoft.com... > > Hello > > I hope you can help me with an issue : > > My PC is Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q9450 2.66GHz windows Vista Ultimate 32 > > bits 8,00GB ram. My brother wants my 2 2GB memory dim because he says 32 > > bits systems don't recognize RAM over 4GB. > > The system says 8GB, and the motherboard Asus > > P5E CHIPSET X38 supports 8GB. Is he right and I have 4 more GB Ram for > > nothing, or is the ram ayhow helpfull and I showld keep it as it is ? > > > > Thankx > > > > Maria Dulce > > > Unfortunately 4 gigs is the maximum that a 32-bit OS can use. In fact, > because some of the address spaces are reserved for hardware (such as the > ram on the video card) the OS actually only has 3.X gigs available to it. > Try reducing the ram to four gigs and observe your PC's performance - you > should not see any difference. 64-bit OS's exist, but there are still > compatibility issues. They are the future though, so you're brother may > have to return the ram in a year or two <g>. > |
| Back |
| Subject: Re: RAM |
| Group: microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance |
| Date: 9/2/2008 1:20:44 PM |
| From: "Mike Hall - MVP" [Email Address Protection] |
"Mark H" <jmhonzell@nospam.comcast.net> wrote in message news:u8ePgzSDJHA.3396@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > I, and probably many others, would have to say Vista x64 has come a long > way > on the compatibility issue. I have yet to run into a problem with x64 > compatibility since Vista was released. > > > "Victek" <Victek@invalid.invalid> wrote in message > news:81C41370-6FCC-4C36-8BA0-2718717A1669@microsoft.com... >> > Hello >> > I hope you can help me with an issue : >> > My PC is Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q9450 2.66GHz windows Vista Ultimate 32 >> > bits 8,00GB ram. My brother wants my 2 2GB memory dim because he says > 32 >> > bits systems don't recognize RAM over 4GB. >> > The system says 8GB, and the motherboard Asus >> > P5E CHIPSET X38 supports 8GB. Is he right and I have 4 more GB Ram for >> > nothing, or is the ram ayhow helpfull and I showld keep it as it is ? >> > >> > Thankx >> > >> > Maria Dulce >> > >> Unfortunately 4 gigs is the maximum that a 32-bit OS can use. In fact, >> because some of the address spaces are reserved for hardware (such as the >> ram on the video card) the OS actually only has 3.X gigs available to it. >> Try reducing the ram to four gigs and observe your PC's performance - you >> should not see any difference. 64-bit OS's exist, but there are still >> compatibility issues. They are the future though, so you're brother may >> have to return the ram in a year or two <g>. >> > > Try archiving mail from Outlook into OneNote.. -- Mike Hall - MVP How to construct a good post.. http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups.. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=newswhelp&style=toc Mike's Window - My Blog.. http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx |
| Back |
| Subject: Re: RAM |
| Group: microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance |
| Date: 9/2/2008 5:25:16 PM |
| From: "Phillips" [Email Address Protection] |
He's right as long as you use a 32-bit OS, but you have a x86-64 CPU w/ the X38 chipset! You should/could install Vista 64-bit and hence use more than 4 GB RAM. Michael "Dulce" <dulce@microsoftdiscussion.com> wrote in message news:C73FBC52-8198-43A0-9B59-9D60F599F5DA@microsoft.com... > Hello > I hope you can help me with an issue : > My PC is Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q9450 2.66GHz windows Vista Ultimate 32 > bits 8,00GB ram. My brother wants my 2 2GB memory dim because he says 32 > bits systems don't recognize RAM over 4GB. > The system says 8GB, and the motherboard Asus > P5E CHIPSET X38 supports 8GB. Is he right and I have 4 more GB Ram for > nothing, or is the ram ayhow helpfull and I showld keep it as it is ? > > Thankx > > Maria Dulce > |
| Back |
| Subject: Re: RAM |
| Group: microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance |
| Date: 9/2/2008 5:40:09 PM |
| From: Paul Montgomery [Email Address Protection] |
On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 20:25:16 -0400, "Phillips" <afn18721@afn.org> wrote: >He's right as long as you use a 32-bit OS, but you have a x86-64 CPU w/ the >X38 chipset! You should/could install Vista 64-bit and hence use more than 4 >GB RAM. >Michael And could then end up with more problems than the extra 4G of RAM is worth. |
| Back |
| Subject: Re: RAM |
| Group: microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance |
| Date: 9/3/2008 3:04:54 AM |
| From: f/fgeorge [Email Address Protection] |
On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:40:09 -0500, Paul Montgomery <i.m.nonnymous@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote: >On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 20:25:16 -0400, "Phillips" <afn18721@afn.org> >wrote: > >>He's right as long as you use a 32-bit OS, but you have a x86-64 CPU w/ the >>X38 chipset! You should/could install Vista 64-bit and hence use more than 4 >>GB RAM. >>Michael > >And could then end up with more problems than the extra 4G of RAM is >worth. ABSOLUTELY correct! The reason the whole World has not gone to 64 bit Vista is due to several things, but software compatability is a biggie! |
| Back |
| Subject: Re: RAM |
| Group: microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance |
| Date: 9/3/2008 5:11:33 AM |
| From: "Mark H" [Email Address Protection] |
Not sure why you believe this to be an x64 or Vista issue. Sounds like an Office issue. I agree some individuals may have incompatibility issues. There are simply too many different standards out there. But, those same individuals might be surprised to know the same issues occur with the x86 version at nearly the same frequency. I simply stated I have had no compatibility issues even though I've changed hard drives, memory, CPU and installed various software items over the last year and one-half. This will not be the case for everyone. But, it is not the issue it used to be with XPx64. "Mike Hall - MVP" <mikehall@remove_mvps.com> wrote in message news:OxHmilTDJHA.1184@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > "Mark H" <jmhonzell@nospam.comcast.net> wrote in message > news:u8ePgzSDJHA.3396@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > > I, and probably many others, would have to say Vista x64 has come a long > > way > > on the compatibility issue. I have yet to run into a problem with x64 > > compatibility since Vista was released. > > > > > > "Victek" <Victek@invalid.invalid> wrote in message > > news:81C41370-6FCC-4C36-8BA0-2718717A1669@microsoft.com... > >> > Hello > >> > I hope you can help me with an issue : > >> > My PC is Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q9450 2.66GHz windows Vista Ultimate 32 > >> > bits 8,00GB ram. My brother wants my 2 2GB memory dim because he says > > 32 > >> > bits systems don't recognize RAM over 4GB. > >> > The system says 8GB, and the motherboard Asus > >> > P5E CHIPSET X38 supports 8GB. Is he right and I have 4 more GB Ram for > >> > nothing, or is the ram ayhow helpfull and I showld keep it as it is ? > >> > > >> > Thankx > >> > > >> > Maria Dulce > >> > > >> Unfortunately 4 gigs is the maximum that a 32-bit OS can use. In fact, > >> because some of the address spaces are reserved for hardware (such as the > >> ram on the video card) the OS actually only has 3.X gigs available to it. > >> Try reducing the ram to four gigs and observe your PC's performance - you > >> should not see any difference. 64-bit OS's exist, but there are still > >> compatibility issues. They are the future though, so you're brother may > >> have to return the ram in a year or two <g>. > >> > > > > > > > Try archiving mail from Outlook into OneNote.. > > > -- > Mike Hall - MVP > How to construct a good post.. > http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm > How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups.. > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=newswhelp&style=toc > Mike's Window - My Blog.. > http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx > > > > |
| Back |
| Subject: Re: RAM |
| Group: microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance |
| Date: 9/3/2008 5:58:16 AM |
| From: "Mike Hall - MVP" [Email Address Protection] |
"Mark H" <jmhonzell@nospam.comcast.net> wrote in message news:%238HOs4bDJHA.4732@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > Not sure why you believe this to be an x64 or Vista issue. Sounds like an > Office issue. > > I agree some individuals may have incompatibility issues. There are simply > too many different standards out there. But, those same individuals might > be > surprised to know the same issues occur with the x86 version at nearly the > same frequency. > > I simply stated I have had no compatibility issues even though I've > changed > hard drives, memory, CPU and installed various software items over the > last > year and one-half. This will not be the case for everyone. But, it is not > the issue it used to be with XPx64. > > > "Mike Hall - MVP" <mikehall@remove_mvps.com> wrote in message > news:OxHmilTDJHA.1184@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >> "Mark H" <jmhonzell@nospam.comcast.net> wrote in message >> news:u8ePgzSDJHA.3396@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >> > I, and probably many others, would have to say Vista x64 has come a >> > long >> > way >> > on the compatibility issue. I have yet to run into a problem with x64 >> > compatibility since Vista was released. >> > >> > >> > "Victek" <Victek@invalid.invalid> wrote in message >> > news:81C41370-6FCC-4C36-8BA0-2718717A1669@microsoft.com... >> >> > Hello >> >> > I hope you can help me with an issue : >> >> > My PC is Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q9450 2.66GHz windows Vista Ultimate > 32 >> >> > bits 8,00GB ram. My brother wants my 2 2GB memory dim because he > says >> > 32 >> >> > bits systems don't recognize RAM over 4GB. >> >> > The system says 8GB, and the motherboard Asus >> >> > P5E CHIPSET X38 supports 8GB. Is he right and I have 4 more GB Ram > for >> >> > nothing, or is the ram ayhow helpfull and I showld keep it as it is >> >> > ? >> >> > >> >> > Thankx >> >> > >> >> > Maria Dulce >> >> > >> >> Unfortunately 4 gigs is the maximum that a 32-bit OS can use. In >> >> fact, >> >> because some of the address spaces are reserved for hardware (such as > the >> >> ram on the video card) the OS actually only has 3.X gigs available to > it. >> >> Try reducing the ram to four gigs and observe your PC's performance - > you >> >> should not see any difference. 64-bit OS's exist, but there are still >> >> compatibility issues. They are the future though, so you're brother > may >> >> have to return the ram in a year or two <g>. >> >> >> > >> > >> >> >> Try archiving mail from Outlook into OneNote.. >> >> >> -- >> Mike Hall - MVP >> How to construct a good post.. >> http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm >> How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups.. >> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=newswhelp&style=toc >> Mike's Window - My Blog.. >> http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx >> >> >> >> > > Of course it is an x64 issue.. there is no driver for the function available for x64, but it works well enough in 32bit versions.. Hardware compatibility is being taken way more seriously than it was for XP64, at least as far as what is in the case, but there are still issues for some peripheral devices, and software. -- Mike Hall - MVP How to construct a good post.. http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups.. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=newswhelp&style=toc Mike's Window - My Blog.. http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx |
| Back |
| Subject: Re: RAM |
| Group: microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance |
| Date: 9/3/2008 8:09:22 AM |
| From: "Mark H" [Email Address Protection] |
Well, I read up on this issue since I don't use OneNote or Outlook and find myself in awe of MS's lack of support for one of their own key products. Hope they actually fix it with the next update to OneNote. "Mike Hall - MVP" <mikehall@remove_mvps.com> wrote in message news:uv$g8ScDJHA.4700@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > "Mark H" <jmhonzell@nospam.comcast.net> wrote in message > news:%238HOs4bDJHA.4732@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > > Not sure why you believe this to be an x64 or Vista issue. Sounds like an > > Office issue. > > > > I agree some individuals may have incompatibility issues. There are simply > > too many different standards out there. But, those same individuals might > > be > > surprised to know the same issues occur with the x86 version at nearly the > > same frequency. > > > > I simply stated I have had no compatibility issues even though I've > > changed > > hard drives, memory, CPU and installed various software items over the > > last > > year and one-half. This will not be the case for everyone. But, it is not > > the issue it used to be with XPx64. > > > > > > "Mike Hall - MVP" <mikehall@remove_mvps.com> wrote in message > > news:OxHmilTDJHA.1184@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > >> "Mark H" <jmhonzell@nospam.comcast.net> wrote in message > >> news:u8ePgzSDJHA.3396@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > >> > I, and probably many others, would have to say Vista x64 has come a > >> > long > >> > way > >> > on the compatibility issue. I have yet to run into a problem with x64 > >> > compatibility since Vista was released. > >> > > >> > > >> > "Victek" <Victek@invalid.invalid> wrote in message > >> > news:81C41370-6FCC-4C36-8BA0-2718717A1669@microsoft.com... > >> >> > Hello > >> >> > I hope you can help me with an issue : > >> >> > My PC is Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q9450 2.66GHz windows Vista Ultimate > > 32 > >> >> > bits 8,00GB ram. My brother wants my 2 2GB memory dim because he > > says > >> > 32 > >> >> > bits systems don't recognize RAM over 4GB. > >> >> > The system says 8GB, and the motherboard Asus > >> >> > P5E CHIPSET X38 supports 8GB. Is he right and I have 4 more GB Ram > > for > >> >> > nothing, or is the ram ayhow helpfull and I showld keep it as it is > >> >> > ? > >> >> > > >> >> > Thankx > >> >> > > >> >> > Maria Dulce > >> >> > > >> >> Unfortunately 4 gigs is the maximum that a 32-bit OS can use. In > >> >> fact, > >> >> because some of the address spaces are reserved for hardware (such as > > the > >> >> ram on the video card) the OS actually only has 3.X gigs available to > > it. > >> >> Try reducing the ram to four gigs and observe your PC's performance - > > you > >> >> should not see any difference. 64-bit OS's exist, but there are still > >> >> compatibility issues. They are the future though, so you're brother > > may > >> >> have to return the ram in a year or two <g>. > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> Try archiving mail from Outlook into OneNote.. > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Mike Hall - MVP > >> How to construct a good post.. > >> http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm > >> How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups.. > >> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=newswhelp&style=toc > >> Mike's Window - My Blog.. > >> http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > Of course it is an x64 issue.. there is no driver for the function available > for x64, but it works well enough in 32bit versions.. > > Hardware compatibility is being taken way more seriously than it was for > XP64, at least as far as what is in the case, but there are still issues for > some peripheral devices, and software. > > -- > Mike Hall - MVP > How to construct a good post.. > http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm > How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups.. > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=newswhelp&style=toc > Mike's Window - My Blog.. > http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx > > > > |
| Back |
| Subject: Re: RAM |
| Group: microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance |
| Date: 9/3/2008 12:58:38 PM |
| From: "Mike Hall - MVP" [Email Address Protection] |
"Mark H" <jmhonzell@nospam.comcast.net> wrote in message news:Ol8pDcdDJHA.4588@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > Well, I read up on this issue since I don't use OneNote or Outlook and > find > myself in awe of MS's lack of support for one of their own key products. > Hope they actually fix it with the next update to OneNote. > > > "Mike Hall - MVP" <mikehall@remove_mvps.com> wrote in message > news:uv$g8ScDJHA.4700@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >> "Mark H" <jmhonzell@nospam.comcast.net> wrote in message >> news:%238HOs4bDJHA.4732@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >> > Not sure why you believe this to be an x64 or Vista issue. Sounds like > an >> > Office issue. >> > >> > I agree some individuals may have incompatibility issues. There are > simply >> > too many different standards out there. But, those same individuals > might >> > be >> > surprised to know the same issues occur with the x86 version at nearly > the >> > same frequency. >> > >> > I simply stated I have had no compatibility issues even though I've >> > changed >> > hard drives, memory, CPU and installed various software items over the >> > last >> > year and one-half. This will not be the case for everyone. But, it is > not >> > the issue it used to be with XPx64. >> > >> > >> > "Mike Hall - MVP" <mikehall@remove_mvps.com> wrote in message >> > news:OxHmilTDJHA.1184@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >> >> "Mark H" <jmhonzell@nospam.comcast.net> wrote in message >> >> news:u8ePgzSDJHA.3396@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >> >> > I, and probably many others, would have to say Vista x64 has come a >> >> > long >> >> > way >> >> > on the compatibility issue. I have yet to run into a problem with >> >> > x64 >> >> > compatibility since Vista was released. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > "Victek" <Victek@invalid.invalid> wrote in message >> >> > news:81C41370-6FCC-4C36-8BA0-2718717A1669@microsoft.com... >> >> >> > Hello >> >> >> > I hope you can help me with an issue : >> >> >> > My PC is Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q9450 2.66GHz windows Vista > Ultimate >> > 32 >> >> >> > bits 8,00GB ram. My brother wants my 2 2GB memory dim because >> >> >> > he >> > says >> >> > 32 >> >> >> > bits systems don't recognize RAM over 4GB. >> >> >> > The system says 8GB, and the motherboard Asus >> >> >> > P5E CHIPSET X38 supports 8GB. Is he right and I have 4 more GB >> >> >> > Ram >> > for >> >> >> > nothing, or is the ram ayhow helpfull and I showld keep it as it > is >> >> >> > ? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Thankx >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Maria Dulce >> >> >> > >> >> >> Unfortunately 4 gigs is the maximum that a 32-bit OS can use. In >> >> >> fact, >> >> >> because some of the address spaces are reserved for hardware (such > as >> > the >> >> >> ram on the video card) the OS actually only has 3.X gigs available > to >> > it. >> >> >> Try reducing the ram to four gigs and observe your PC's > performance - >> > you >> >> >> should not see any difference. 64-bit OS's exist, but there are > still >> >> >> compatibility issues. They are the future though, so you're >> >> >> brother >> > may >> >> >> have to return the ram in a year or two <g>. >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> Try archiving mail from Outlook into OneNote.. >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Mike Hall - MVP >> >> How to construct a good post.. >> >> http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm >> >> How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups.. >> >> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=newswhelp&style=toc >> >> Mike's Window - My Blog.. >> >> http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >> >> Of course it is an x64 issue.. there is no driver for the function > available >> for x64, but it works well enough in 32bit versions.. >> >> Hardware compatibility is being taken way more seriously than it was for >> XP64, at least as far as what is in the case, but there are still issues > for >> some peripheral devices, and software. >> >> -- >> Mike Hall - MVP >> How to construct a good post.. >> http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm >> How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups.. >> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=newswhelp&style=toc >> Mike's Window - My Blog.. >> http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx >> >> >> >> > > You can't include an x64 driver in a 32bit product. The problem will be resolved with the next version of Office most likely.. presumably there will be a 64bit version.. -- Mike Hall - MVP How to construct a good post.. http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups.. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=newswhelp&style=toc Mike's Window - My Blog.. http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx |
| Back |
| Subject: Re: RAM |
| Group: microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance |
| Date: 9/4/2008 2:34:16 AM |
| From: "Mike Brannigan" [Email Address Protection] |
"Mike Hall - MVP" <mikehall@remove_mvps.com> wrote in message news:OxHmilTDJHA.1184@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > "Mark H" <jmhonzell@nospam.comcast.net> wrote in message > news:u8ePgzSDJHA.3396@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >> I, and probably many others, would have to say Vista x64 has come a long >> way >> on the compatibility issue. I have yet to run into a problem with x64 >> compatibility since Vista was released. >> >> >> "Victek" <Victek@invalid.invalid> wrote in message >> news:81C41370-6FCC-4C36-8BA0-2718717A1669@microsoft.com... >>> > Hello >>> > I hope you can help me with an issue : >>> > My PC is Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q9450 2.66GHz windows Vista Ultimate >>> > 32 >>> > bits 8,00GB ram. My brother wants my 2 2GB memory dim because he >>> > says >> 32 >>> > bits systems don't recognize RAM over 4GB. >>> > The system says 8GB, and the motherboard Asus >>> > P5E CHIPSET X38 supports 8GB. Is he right and I have 4 more GB Ram for >>> > nothing, or is the ram ayhow helpfull and I showld keep it as it is ? >>> > >>> > Thankx >>> > >>> > Maria Dulce >>> > >>> Unfortunately 4 gigs is the maximum that a 32-bit OS can use. In fact, >>> because some of the address spaces are reserved for hardware (such as >>> the >>> ram on the video card) the OS actually only has 3.X gigs available to >>> it. >>> Try reducing the ram to four gigs and observe your PC's performance - >>> you >>> should not see any difference. 64-bit OS's exist, but there are still >>> compatibility issues. They are the future though, so you're brother may >>> have to return the ram in a year or two <g>. >>> >> >> > > > Try archiving mail from Outlook into OneNote.. > > > -- > Mike Hall - MVP > How to construct a good post.. > http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm > How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups.. > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=newswhelp&style=toc > Mike's Window - My Blog.. > http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx > > > If by "archiving mail from Outlook into OneNote.." you mean when you right click on a message and "Send to OneNote" then that functions perfectly on x64 Windows Vista with Office 2007 (all patched to latest service packs and all updates). I have looked at a x86 (32-bit) system and did not see any additional options to archive to anything other then a PST file. Can you elaborate on your issue? -- Mike Brannigan |
| Back |
| Subject: Re: RAM |
| Group: microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance |
| Date: 9/4/2008 6:24:11 AM |
| From: "Mike Hall - MVP" [Email Address Protection] |
"Mike Brannigan" <Mike.Brannigan@localhost> wrote in message news:6F817A20-BCD2-4230-8A48-AA6599BC613C@microsoft.com... > "Mike Hall - MVP" <mikehall@remove_mvps.com> wrote in message > news:OxHmilTDJHA.1184@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >> "Mark H" <jmhonzell@nospam.comcast.net> wrote in message >> news:u8ePgzSDJHA.3396@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >>> I, and probably many others, would have to say Vista x64 has come a long >>> way >>> on the compatibility issue. I have yet to run into a problem with x64 >>> compatibility since Vista was released. >>> >>> >>> "Victek" <Victek@invalid.invalid> wrote in message >>> news:81C41370-6FCC-4C36-8BA0-2718717A1669@microsoft.com... >>>> > Hello >>>> > I hope you can help me with an issue : >>>> > My PC is Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q9450 2.66GHz windows Vista Ultimate >>>> > 32 >>>> > bits 8,00GB ram. My brother wants my 2 2GB memory dim because he >>>> > says >>> 32 >>>> > bits systems don't recognize RAM over 4GB. >>>> > The system says 8GB, and the motherboard Asus >>>> > P5E CHIPSET X38 supports 8GB. Is he right and I have 4 more GB Ram >>>> > for >>>> > nothing, or is the ram ayhow helpfull and I showld keep it as it is ? >>>> > >>>> > Thankx >>>> > >>>> > Maria Dulce >>>> > >>>> Unfortunately 4 gigs is the maximum that a 32-bit OS can use. In fact, >>>> because some of the address spaces are reserved for hardware (such as >>>> the >>>> ram on the video card) the OS actually only has 3.X gigs available to >>>> it. >>>> Try reducing the ram to four gigs and observe your PC's performance - >>>> you >>>> should not see any difference. 64-bit OS's exist, but there are still >>>> compatibility issues. They are the future though, so you're brother >>>> may >>>> have to return the ram in a year or two <g>. >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> Try archiving mail from Outlook into OneNote.. >> >> >> -- >> Mike Hall - MVP >> How to construct a good post.. >> http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm >> How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups.. >> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=newswhelp&style=toc >> Mike's Window - My Blog.. >> http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx >> >> >> > > If by "archiving mail from Outlook into OneNote.." you mean when you right > click on a message and "Send to OneNote" then that functions perfectly on > x64 Windows Vista with Office 2007 (all patched to latest service packs > and > all updates). > > I have looked at a x86 (32-bit) system and did not see any additional > options to archive to anything other then a PST file. > > Can you elaborate on your issue? > > -- > > Mike Brannigan > > I do archive by way of the send to OneNote feature. This issue was raised at the very beginning and I was made aware by the Office team that the issue would not be fixed until the next release of Office. I have to do some re-organization of my system to accommodate Vista 64, but I will try it. This is the only reason left standing for me not moving to Vista 64.. -- Mike Hall - MVP How to construct a good post.. http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups.. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=newswhelp&style=toc Mike's Window - My Blog.. http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx |
| Back |
| Subject: Re: RAM |
| Group: microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance |
| Date: 9/4/2008 7:12:08 AM |
| From: "Mike Brannigan" [Email Address Protection] |
"Mike Hall - MVP" <mikehall@remove_mvps.com> wrote in message news:Ox5CFGpDJHA.1628@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > "Mike Brannigan" <Mike.Brannigan@localhost> wrote in message > news:6F817A20-BCD2-4230-8A48-AA6599BC613C@microsoft.com... >> "Mike Hall - MVP" <mikehall@remove_mvps.com> wrote in message >> news:OxHmilTDJHA.1184@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >>> "Mark H" <jmhonzell@nospam.comcast.net> wrote in message >>> news:u8ePgzSDJHA.3396@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >>>> I, and probably many others, would have to say Vista x64 has come a >>>> long way >>>> on the compatibility issue. I have yet to run into a problem with x64 >>>> compatibility since Vista was released. >>>> >>>> >>>> "Victek" <Victek@invalid.invalid> wrote in message >>>> news:81C41370-6FCC-4C36-8BA0-2718717A1669@microsoft.com... >>>>> > Hello >>>>> > I hope you can help me with an issue : >>>>> > My PC is Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q9450 2.66GHz windows Vista Ultimate >>>>> > 32 >>>>> > bits 8,00GB ram. My brother wants my 2 2GB memory dim because he >>>>> > says >>>> 32 >>>>> > bits systems don't recognize RAM over 4GB. >>>>> > The system says 8GB, and the motherboard Asus >>>>> > P5E CHIPSET X38 supports 8GB. Is he right and I have 4 more GB Ram >>>>> > for >>>>> > nothing, or is the ram ayhow helpfull and I showld keep it as it is >>>>> > ? >>>>> > >>>>> > Thankx >>>>> > >>>>> > Maria Dulce >>>>> > >>>>> Unfortunately 4 gigs is the maximum that a 32-bit OS can use. In >>>>> fact, >>>>> because some of the address spaces are reserved for hardware (such as >>>>> the >>>>> ram on the video card) the OS actually only has 3.X gigs available to >>>>> it. >>>>> Try reducing the ram to four gigs and observe your PC's performance - >>>>> you >>>>> should not see any difference. 64-bit OS's exist, but there are still >>>>> compatibility issues. They are the future though, so you're brother >>>>> may >>>>> have to return the ram in a year or two <g>. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> Try archiving mail from Outlook into OneNote.. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Mike Hall - MVP >>> How to construct a good post.. >>> http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm >>> How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups.. >>> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=newswhelp&style=toc >>> Mike's Window - My Blog.. >>> http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx >>> >>> >>> >> >> If by "archiving mail from Outlook into OneNote.." you mean when you >> right >> click on a message and "Send to OneNote" then that functions perfectly on >> x64 Windows Vista with Office 2007 (all patched to latest service packs >> and >> all updates). >> >> I have looked at a x86 (32-bit) system and did not see any additional >> options to archive to anything other then a PST file. >> >> Can you elaborate on your issue? >> >> -- >> >> Mike Brannigan >> >> > > > I do archive by way of the send to OneNote feature. > > This issue was raised at the very beginning and I was made aware by the > Office team that the issue would not be fixed until the next release of > Office. > > I have to do some re-organization of my system to accommodate Vista 64, > but I will try it. This is the only reason left standing for me not moving > to Vista 64.. > > > -- > Mike Hall - MVP > How to construct a good post.. > http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm > How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups.. > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=newswhelp&style=toc > Mike's Window - My Blog.. > http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx > > > "Send To OneNote" from a mail item in Outlook 2007 with SP1 and all updates on Windows Vista Ultimate x64 SP1 with all updates - functions correctly and without error. -- Mike Brannigan |
| Back |
| Subject: Re: RAM |
| Group: microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance |
| Date: 9/4/2008 12:29:39 PM |
| From: "Mike Hall - MVP" [Email Address Protection] |
"Mike Brannigan" <Mike.Brannigan@localhost> wrote in message news:74B53A01-DA7E-49E5-B7FA-E7A30C58B88D@microsoft.com... > "Mike Hall - MVP" <mikehall@remove_mvps.com> wrote in message > news:Ox5CFGpDJHA.1628@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >> "Mike Brannigan" <Mike.Brannigan@localhost> wrote in message >> news:6F817A20-BCD2-4230-8A48-AA6599BC613C@microsoft.com... >>> "Mike Hall - MVP" <mikehall@remove_mvps.com> wrote in message >>> news:OxHmilTDJHA.1184@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >>>> "Mark H" <jmhonzell@nospam.comcast.net> wrote in message >>>> news:u8ePgzSDJHA.3396@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >>>>> I, and probably many others, would have to say Vista x64 has come a >>>>> long way >>>>> on the compatibility issue. I have yet to run into a problem with x64 >>>>> compatibility since Vista was released. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Victek" <Victek@invalid.invalid> wrote in message >>>>> news:81C41370-6FCC-4C36-8BA0-2718717A1669@microsoft.com... >>>>>> > Hello >>>>>> > I hope you can help me with an issue : >>>>>> > My PC is Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q9450 2.66GHz windows Vista >>>>>> > Ultimate 32 >>>>>> > bits 8,00GB ram. My brother wants my 2 2GB memory dim because he >>>>>> > says >>>>> 32 >>>>>> > bits systems don't recognize RAM over 4GB. >>>>>> > The system says 8GB, and the motherboard Asus >>>>>> > P5E CHIPSET X38 supports 8GB. Is he right and I have 4 more GB Ram >>>>>> > for >>>>>> > nothing, or is the ram ayhow helpfull and I showld keep it as it is >>>>>> > ? >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Thankx >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Maria Dulce >>>>>> > >>>>>> Unfortunately 4 gigs is the maximum that a 32-bit OS can use. In >>>>>> fact, >>>>>> because some of the address spaces are reserved for hardware (such as >>>>>> the >>>>>> ram on the video card) the OS actually only has 3.X gigs available to >>>>>> it. >>>>>> Try reducing the ram to four gigs and observe your PC's performance - >>>>>> you >>>>>> should not see any difference. 64-bit OS's exist, but there are >>>>>> still >>>>>> compatibility issues. They are the future though, so you're brother >>>>>> may >>>>>> have to return the ram in a year or two <g>. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Try archiving mail from Outlook into OneNote.. >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Mike Hall - MVP >>>> How to construct a good post.. >>>> http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm >>>> How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups.. >>>> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=newswhelp&style=toc >>>> Mike's Window - My Blog.. >>>> http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> If by "archiving mail from Outlook into OneNote.." you mean when you >>> right >>> click on a message and "Send to OneNote" then that functions perfectly >>> on >>> x64 Windows Vista with Office 2007 (all patched to latest service packs >>> and >>> all updates). >>> >>> I have looked at a x86 (32-bit) system and did not see any additional >>> options to archive to anything other then a PST file. >>> >>> Can you elaborate on your issue? >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Mike Brannigan >>> >>> >> >> >> I do archive by way of the send to OneNote feature. >> >> This issue was raised at the very beginning and I was made aware by the >> Office team that the issue would not be fixed until the next release of >> Office. >> >> I have to do some re-organization of my system to accommodate Vista 64, >> but I will try it. This is the only reason left standing for me not >> moving to Vista 64.. >> >> >> -- >> Mike Hall - MVP >> How to construct a good post.. >> http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm >> How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups.. >> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=newswhelp&style=toc >> Mike's Window - My Blog.. >> http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx >> >> >> > > "Send To OneNote" from a mail item in Outlook 2007 with SP1 and all > updates > on Windows Vista Ultimate x64 SP1 with all updates - functions correctly > and without error. > > > -- > > Mike Brannigan > This is where my initial info originated.. http://blog.nils-kaiser.de/2008/06/20/how-to-get-back-send-to-onenote-on-vista-x64/ There was a work around but it cost $50.. http://blog.nils-kaiser.de/2008/06/20/how-to-get-back-send-to-onenote-on-vista-x64/ It is good to know that MS fixed the problem.. Now all I have to do is replace my old scanner, and I will be x64 ready.. -- Mike Hall - MVP How to construct a good post.. http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups.. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=newswhelp&style=toc Mike's Window - My Blog.. http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx |
| Back |
| Subject: Re: RAM |
| Group: microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance |
| Date: 9/4/2008 12:30:28 PM |
| From: "Mike Hall - MVP" [Email Address Protection] |
"Mike Brannigan" <Mike.Brannigan@localhost> wrote in message news:74B53A01-DA7E-49E5-B7FA-E7A30C58B88D@microsoft.com... > "Mike Hall - MVP" <mikehall@remove_mvps.com> wrote in message > news:Ox5CFGpDJHA.1628@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >> "Mike Brannigan" <Mike.Brannigan@localhost> wrote in message >> news:6F817A20-BCD2-4230-8A48-AA6599BC613C@microsoft.com... >>> "Mike Hall - MVP" <mikehall@remove_mvps.com> wrote in message >>> news:OxHmilTDJHA.1184@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >>>> "Mark H" <jmhonzell@nospam.comcast.net> wrote in message >>>> news:u8ePgzSDJHA.3396@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >>>>> I, and probably many others, would have to say Vista x64 has come a >>>>> long way >>>>> on the compatibility issue. I have yet to run into a problem with x64 >>>>> compatibility since Vista was released. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Victek" <Victek@invalid.invalid> wrote in message >>>>> news:81C41370-6FCC-4C36-8BA0-2718717A1669@microsoft.com... >>>>>> > Hello >>>>>> > I hope you can help me with an issue : >>>>>> > My PC is Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q9450 2.66GHz windows Vista >>>>>> > Ultimate 32 >>>>>> > bits 8,00GB ram. My brother wants my 2 2GB memory dim because he >>>>>> > says >>>>> 32 >>>>>> > bits systems don't recognize RAM over 4GB. >>>>>> > The system says 8GB, and the motherboard Asus >>>>>> > P5E CHIPSET X38 supports 8GB. Is he right and I have 4 more GB Ram >>>>>> > for >>>>>> > nothing, or is the ram ayhow helpfull and I showld keep it as it is >>>>>> > ? >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Thankx >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Maria Dulce >>>>>> > >>>>>> Unfortunately 4 gigs is the maximum that a 32-bit OS can use. In >>>>>> fact, >>>>>> because some of the address spaces are reserved for hardware (such as >>>>>> the >>>>>> ram on the video card) the OS actually only has 3.X gigs available to >>>>>> it. >>>>>> Try reducing the ram to four gigs and observe your PC's performance - >>>>>> you >>>>>> should not see any difference. 64-bit OS's exist, but there are >>>>>> still >>>>>> compatibility issues. They are the future though, so you're brother >>>>>> may >>>>>> have to return the ram in a year or two <g>. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Try archiving mail from Outlook into OneNote.. >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Mike Hall - MVP >>>> How to construct a good post.. >>>> http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm >>>> How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups.. >>>> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=newswhelp&style=toc >>>> Mike's Window - My Blog.. >>>> http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> If by "archiving mail from Outlook into OneNote.." you mean when you >>> right >>> click on a message and "Send to OneNote" then that functions perfectly >>> on >>> x64 Windows Vista with Office 2007 (all patched to latest service packs >>> and >>> all updates). >>> >>> I have looked at a x86 (32-bit) system and did not see any additional >>> options to archive to anything other then a PST file. >>> >>> Can you elaborate on your issue? >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Mike Brannigan >>> >>> >> >> >> I do archive by way of the send to OneNote feature. >> >> This issue was raised at the very beginning and I was made aware by the >> Office team that the issue would not be fixed until the next release of >> Office. >> >> I have to do some re-organization of my system to accommodate Vista 64, >> but I will try it. This is the only reason left standing for me not >> moving to Vista 64.. >> >> >> -- >> Mike Hall - MVP >> How to construct a good post.. >> http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm >> How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups.. >> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=newswhelp&style=toc >> Mike's Window - My Blog.. >> http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx >> >> >> > > "Send To OneNote" from a mail item in Outlook 2007 with SP1 and all > updates > on Windows Vista Ultimate x64 SP1 with all updates - functions correctly > and without error. > > > -- > > Mike Brannigan > Missed this one.. http://blogs.msdn.com/david_rasmussen/archive/2008/04/21/onenote-64-bit-print-driver.aspx -- Mike Hall - MVP How to construct a good post.. http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups.. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=newswhelp&style=toc Mike's Window - My Blog.. http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx |
| Back |
| Subject: Re: RAM |
| Group: microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance |
| Date: 9/5/2008 1:33:04 AM |
| From: "Mike Brannigan" [Email Address Protection] |
Mike, You are confusing a couple of different issues here. Specifically the feature on the Outlook 2007 context menu for a mail message "Send To OneNote" - this works fine and without problem. (This function copies a mail message from Outlook to a page in OneNote. What a number of the links you provided and then have more links inside are actually focusing on is the Send To One\note 2007 PRINTER DRIVER - that allows you to print from any application but instead of the output going to a physical device etc it arrives on a page in OneNote - Now there is no x64 OneNote Printer driver, but this does not impact your issue which has always worked (Send To OneNote from Outlook.) [OneNote Print driver support for x64 Windows may arrive with Office "14"] -- Mike Brannigan "Mike Hall - MVP" <mikehall@remove_mvps.com> wrote in message news:uRwqTSsDJHA.2056@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > "Mike Brannigan" <Mike.Brannigan@localhost> wrote in message > news:74B53A01-DA7E-49E5-B7FA-E7A30C58B88D@microsoft.com... >> "Mike Hall - MVP" <mikehall@remove_mvps.com> wrote in message >> news:Ox5CFGpDJHA.1628@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >>> "Mike Brannigan" <Mike.Brannigan@localhost> wrote in message >>> news:6F817A20-BCD2-4230-8A48-AA6599BC613C@microsoft.com... >>>> "Mike Hall - MVP" <mikehall@remove_mvps.com> wrote in message >>>> news:OxHmilTDJHA.1184@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >>>>> "Mark H" <jmhonzell@nospam.comcast.net> wrote in message >>>>> news:u8ePgzSDJHA.3396@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >>>>>> I, and probably many others, would have to say Vista x64 has come a >>>>>> long way >>>>>> on the compatibility issue. I have yet to run into a problem with x64 >>>>>> compatibility since Vista was released. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Victek" <Victek@invalid.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>> news:81C41370-6FCC-4C36-8BA0-2718717A1669@microsoft.com... >>>>>>> > Hello >>>>>>> > I hope you can help me with an issue : >>>>>>> > My PC is Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q9450 2.66GHz windows Vista >>>>>>> > Ultimate 32 >>>>>>> > bits 8,00GB ram. My brother wants my 2 2GB memory dim because he >>>>>>> > says >>>>>> 32 >>>>>>> > bits systems don't recognize RAM over 4GB. >>>>>>> > The system says 8GB, and the motherboard Asus >>>>>>> > P5E CHIPSET X38 supports 8GB. Is he right and I have 4 more GB Ram >>>>>>> > for >>>>>>> > nothing, or is the ram ayhow helpfull and I showld keep it as it >>>>>>> > is ? >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Thankx >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Maria Dulce >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Unfortunately 4 gigs is the maximum that a 32-bit OS can use. In >>>>>>> fact, >>>>>>> because some of the address spaces are reserved for hardware (such >>>>>>> as the >>>>>>> ram on the video card) the OS actually only has 3.X gigs available >>>>>>> to it. >>>>>>> Try reducing the ram to four gigs and observe your PC's >>>>>>> performance - you >>>>>>> should not see any difference. 64-bit OS's exist, but there are >>>>>>> still >>>>>>> compatibility issues. They are the future though, so you're brother >>>>>>> may >>>>>>> have to return the ram in a year or two <g>. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Try archiving mail from Outlook into OneNote.. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Mike Hall - MVP >>>>> How to construct a good post.. >>>>> http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm >>>>> How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups.. >>>>> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=newswhelp&style=toc >>>>> Mike's Window - My Blog.. >>>>> http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> If by "archiving mail from Outlook into OneNote.." you mean when you >>>> right >>>> click on a message and "Send to OneNote" then that functions perfectly >>>> on >>>> x64 Windows Vista with Office 2007 (all patched to latest service packs >>>> and >>>> all updates). >>>> >>>> I have looked at a x86 (32-bit) system and did not see any additional >>>> options to archive to anything other then a PST file. >>>> >>>> Can you elaborate on your issue? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Mike Brannigan >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> I do archive by way of the send to OneNote feature. >>> >>> This issue was raised at the very beginning and I was made aware by the >>> Office team that the issue would not be fixed until the next release of >>> Office. >>> >>> I have to do some re-organization of my system to accommodate Vista 64, >>> but I will try it. This is the only reason left standing for me not >>> moving to Vista 64.. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Mike Hall - MVP >>> How to construct a good post.. >>> http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm >>> How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups.. >>> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=newswhelp&style=toc >>> Mike's Window - My Blog.. >>> http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx >>> >>> >>> >> >> "Send To OneNote" from a mail item in Outlook 2007 with SP1 and all >> updates >> on Windows Vista Ultimate x64 SP1 with all updates - functions correctly >> and without error. >> >> >> -- >> >> Mike Brannigan >> > > > This is where my initial info originated.. > > http://blog.nils-kaiser.de/2008/06/20/how-to-get-back-send-to-onenote-on-vista-x64/ > > There was a work around but it cost $50.. > > http://blog.nils-kaiser.de/2008/06/20/how-to-get-back-send-to-onenote-on-vista-x64/ > > It is good to know that MS fixed the problem.. Now all I have to do is > replace my old scanner, and I will be x64 ready.. > > > -- > Mike Hall - MVP > How to construct a good post.. > http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm > How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups.. > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=newswhelp&style=toc > Mike's Window - My Blog.. > http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx > > > > |
| Back |