Windows Vista Beta | WinVistaBeta.com - Message | Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 3 Will Not RTW Until April 29th,

July 05, 2008  
Subject: Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 3 Will Not RTW Until April 29th,
Group: microsoft.public.msdn.general
Date: 4/21/2008 1:40:52 PM
From: "none@none" [Email Address Protection]

Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 3 Will Not RTW Until April 29th, 2008,
Just FYI.

http://www.neowin.net/

Back
Subject: Re: Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 3 Will Not RTW Until April 29th, 2008, Just FYI.
Group: microsoft.public.msdn.general
Date: 4/21/2008 6:34:12 PM
From: "PvdG42" [Email Address Protection]

<none@none> wrote in message
news:Op90%23$%23oIHA.4760@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 3 Will Not RTW Until April 29th, 2008,
> Just FYI.
>
> http://www.neowin.net/


Credible source?
Did you mean RTM?


Back
Subject: Re: Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 3 Will Not RTW Until April
Group: microsoft.public.msdn.general
Date: 4/22/2008 12:32:01 AM
From: David Hearn [Email Address Protection]

PvdG42 wrote:
> <none@none> wrote in message
> news:Op90%23$%23oIHA.4760@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 3 Will Not RTW Until April 29th,
>> 2008, Just FYI.
>>
>> http://www.neowin.net/
>
>
> Credible source?
> Did you mean RTM?

And if it is, what he's saying is that it'll RTM in 7 days. That's
hardly a negative thing is it?

D

Back
Subject: Re: Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 3 Will Not RTW Until April 29th, 2008, Just FYI.
Group: microsoft.public.msdn.general
Date: 4/22/2008 7:18:26 AM
From: "JD" [Email Address Protection]

Everything Is Negative To That Guy, FYI

"David Hearn" <david.hearn@newsgroup.nospam> wrote in message
news:u45b1rEpIHA.4928@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> PvdG42 wrote:
>> <none@none> wrote in message
>> news:Op90%23$%23oIHA.4760@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>> Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 3 Will Not RTW Until April 29th, 2008,
>>> Just FYI.
>>>
>>> http://www.neowin.net/
>>
>>
>> Credible source?
>> Did you mean RTM?
>
> And if it is, what he's saying is that it'll RTM in 7 days. That's hardly
> a negative thing is it?
>
> D



Back
Subject: Re: Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 3 Will Not RTW Until April 29th, 2008, Just FYI.
Group: microsoft.public.msdn.general
Date: 4/22/2008 7:53:28 AM
From: "PvdG42" [Email Address Protection]

"David Hearn" <david.hearn@newsgroup.nospam> wrote in message
news:u45b1rEpIHA.4928@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> PvdG42 wrote:
>> <none@none> wrote in message
>> news:Op90%23$%23oIHA.4760@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>> Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 3 Will Not RTW Until April 29th, 2008,
>>> Just FYI.
>>>
>>> http://www.neowin.net/
>>
>>
>> Credible source?
>> Did you mean RTM?
>
> And if it is, what he's saying is that it'll RTM in 7 days. That's hardly
> a negative thing is it?
>
> D

Of course not :-)
I was just wondering where he got the date.


Back
Subject: Re: Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 3 Will Not RTW Until April 29th, 2008, Just FYI.
Group: microsoft.public.msdn.general
Date: 4/22/2008 11:09:03 AM
From: "Leen" [Email Address Protection]

At least that guy has a real name.....

--

Have a nice day!
Leen
For free tools and information to burn an iso file to CD , DVD , HD DVD ,
Blu-Ray
http://iso.snoekonline.com/iso.htm (updated 4/2/2008)



"JD" <yazoo@newsgroup.nospam> wrote in message
news:%23rYX8OIpIHA.4112@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Everything Is Negative To That Guy, FYI
>
> "David Hearn" <david.hearn@newsgroup.nospam> wrote in message
> news:u45b1rEpIHA.4928@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> PvdG42 wrote:
>>> <none@none> wrote in message
>>> news:Op90%23$%23oIHA.4760@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>>> Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 3 Will Not RTW Until April 29th,
>>>> 2008, Just FYI.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.neowin.net/
>>>
>>>
>>> Credible source?
>>> Did you mean RTM?
>>
>> And if it is, what he's saying is that it'll RTM in 7 days. That's
>> hardly a negative thing is it?
>>
>> D
>
>


Back
Subject: Re: Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 3 Will Not RTW Until April 29th, 2008, Just FYI.
Group: microsoft.public.msdn.general
Date: 4/23/2008 1:39:56 AM
From: "Lawrence Groves" [Email Address Protection]

"PvdG42" <pvdg@toadstool.edu> wrote in message
news:uy4GniIpIHA.1736@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> "David Hearn" <david.hearn@newsgroup.nospam> wrote in message
> news:u45b1rEpIHA.4928@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> PvdG42 wrote:
>>> <none@none> wrote in message
>>> news:Op90%23$%23oIHA.4760@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>>> Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 3 Will Not RTW Until April 29th,
>>>> 2008, Just FYI.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.neowin.net/
>>>
>>>
>>> Credible source?
>>> Did you mean RTM?
>>
>> And if it is, what he's saying is that it'll RTM in 7 days. That's
>> hardly a negative thing is it?
>>
>> D
>
> Of course not :-)
> I was just wondering where he got the date.

Did I just miss something? I downloaded what I *thought* was the RTM version
from MSDN on February 12th and have been running it ever since. Was it
pulled after that for some reason?

TIA, Loz.


Back
Subject: Re: Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 3 Will Not RTW Until April 29th, 2008, Just FYI.
Group: microsoft.public.msdn.general
Date: 4/23/2008 7:07:36 AM
From: "PvdG42" [Email Address Protection]

"Lawrence Groves" <lgroves@ducostassociates.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:fumsgf$mru$1$8302bc10@news.demon.co.uk...
> "PvdG42" <pvdg@toadstool.edu> wrote in message
> news:uy4GniIpIHA.1736@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> "David Hearn" <david.hearn@newsgroup.nospam> wrote in message
>> news:u45b1rEpIHA.4928@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>> PvdG42 wrote:
>>>> <none@none> wrote in message
>>>> news:Op90%23$%23oIHA.4760@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>>>> Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 3 Will Not RTW Until April 29th,
>>>>> 2008, Just FYI.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.neowin.net/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Credible source?
>>>> Did you mean RTM?
>>>
>>> And if it is, what he's saying is that it'll RTM in 7 days. That's
>>> hardly a negative thing is it?
>>>
>>> D
>>
>> Of course not :-)
>> I was just wondering where he got the date.
>
> Did I just miss something? I downloaded what I *thought* was the RTM
> version from MSDN on February 12th and have been running it ever since.
> Was it pulled after that for some reason?
>
> TIA, Loz.
>

I think so. You must have a beta or RC version. Read here:

http://forums.microsoft.com/TechNet/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=3214173&SiteID=17


Back
Subject: Re: Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 3 Will Not RTW Until April 29th, 2008, Just FYI.
Group: microsoft.public.msdn.general
Date: 4/24/2008 1:26:32 AM
From: "Lawrence Groves" [Email Address Protection]

"PvdG42" <pvdg@toadstool.edu> wrote in message
news:uYoZltUpIHA.524@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> "Lawrence Groves" <lgroves@ducostassociates.nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:fumsgf$mru$1$8302bc10@news.demon.co.uk...
>> "PvdG42" <pvdg@toadstool.edu> wrote in message
>> news:uy4GniIpIHA.1736@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>> "David Hearn" <david.hearn@newsgroup.nospam> wrote in message
>>> news:u45b1rEpIHA.4928@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>>> PvdG42 wrote:
>>>>> <none@none> wrote in message
>>>>> news:Op90%23$%23oIHA.4760@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>>>>> Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 3 Will Not RTW Until April 29th,
>>>>>> 2008, Just FYI.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.neowin.net/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Credible source?
>>>>> Did you mean RTM?
>>>>
>>>> And if it is, what he's saying is that it'll RTM in 7 days. That's
>>>> hardly a negative thing is it?
>>>>
>>>> D
>>>
>>> Of course not :-)
>>> I was just wondering where he got the date.
>>
>> Did I just miss something? I downloaded what I *thought* was the RTM
>> version from MSDN on February 12th and have been running it ever since.
>> Was it pulled after that for some reason?
>>
>> TIA, Loz.
>>
>
> I think so. You must have a beta or RC version. Read here:
>
> http://forums.microsoft.com/TechNet/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=3214173&SiteID=17

You are right, I just checked, its RC v3264. I must have been having a bad
day back then!! I never usually install a beta or RC of something like a
service pack. Oops!!

Thanks for the info, Loz.


Back