| Subject: VC++ 6.0 is not supporting the Platform SDK! |
| Group: microsoft.public.winternals |
| Date: 5/15/2007 5:44:35 AM |
| From: "Shyam Barnwal" [Email Address Protection] |
Dear sir/madam, I am working on winamp general purpose pluggin "gen_whatsplaying " project I downloaded the project "gen_whatsplaying" available on www.schaffrath.net .. I am working on it, but getting many errors during compilation and building the application successfully. I am using MS VC++ 6.0 compiler to compile and build it. I also downloaded and installed the speech SDK 5.1 from MS site and Winamp SDK's from Winamp's web site on my PC to remove the errors. But still I am getting many compilation and linking errors during the build, and therefore unable to get the desired .dll file for winamp general plugins. As suggested by the project developer, and as per microsoft specification, I downloaded and installed the February 2003 version of the Platform SDK on my C:\ drive and configured it to use with VC++ 6.0 Now , after making all the changes to configuration setting to include and lib, in VC++ 6.0 when I am building the project, I didn't see any changes in the previous errors which I used to get during compilation before it all remains the same, no changes at all. I think VS 6.0 is not supporting the "February 2003 version of the Platform SDK at all. Just wanted to know if any one knows about it in this community to help me out. I really appreciate yours help and kind cooperation with me. I request you to please let me know how do I get rid of this problem now. any help on it is highly appreciated. Thanks, shyam |
| Back |
| Subject: Re: VC++ 6.0 is not supporting the Platform SDK! |
| Group: microsoft.public.winternals |
| Date: 5/15/2007 9:20:23 AM |
| From: "Kerem Gmrkc" [Email Address Protection] |
"Shyam Barnwal" <sbarnwal@i3jukebox.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:eWdZM7ulHHA.596@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > Dear sir/madam, > > I am working on winamp general purpose pluggin "gen_whatsplaying " project > I downloaded the project "gen_whatsplaying" available on > www.schaffrath.net . > I am working on it, but getting many errors during compilation and > building the application successfully. I am using MS VC++ 6.0 compiler to > compile and build it. > I also downloaded and installed the speech SDK 5.1 from MS site and Winamp > SDK's from Winamp's web site on my PC to remove the errors. But still I > am getting many compilation and linking errors during the build, and > therefore unable to get the desired .dll file for winamp general plugins. > As suggested by the project developer, and as per microsoft specification, > I downloaded and installed the February 2003 version of the Platform SDK > on my C:\ drive and configured it to use with VC++ 6.0 > Now , after making all the changes to configuration setting to include and > lib, in VC++ 6.0 when I am building the project, I didn't see any changes > in the previous errors which I used to get during compilation before it > all remains the same, no changes at all. I think VS 6.0 is not supporting > the "February 2003 version of the Platform SDK at all. > > Just wanted to know if any one knows about it in this community to help me > out. I really appreciate yours help and kind cooperation with me. > I request you to please let me know how do I get rid of this problem now. > any help on it is highly appreciated. > > > Thanks, > shyam > > Hi Shyam, it would be very good if you could post some of the build errors. Notably most fo them are a result of missing includes i think or wrong paths or missing linking directories. But it would be very good if you could post some detailed compiler/linker errors, so that we can tell you the (possible) reasons for them. Best regards Kerem Gmrkc |
| Back |
| Subject: Re: VC++ 6.0 is not supporting the Platform SDK! |
| Group: microsoft.public.winternals |
| Date: 5/15/2007 1:53:15 PM |
| From: "Homer J. Simpson" [Email Address Protection] |
> it would be very good if you could post some of the build errors. > Notably most fo them are a result of missing includes i think or > wrong paths or missing linking directories. But it would be very > good if you could post some detailed compiler/linker errors, so that > we can tell you the (possible) reasons for them. It would be very good also if the OP could use one of the many microsoft.public.platformsdk.* newsgroups. Unless I've missed something, this has nothing to do with winternals. |
| Back |
| Subject: Re: VC++ 6.0 is not supporting the Platform SDK! |
| Group: microsoft.public.winternals |
| Date: 5/15/2007 2:14:55 PM |
| From: "Karl E. Peterson" [Email Address Protection] |
Homer J. Simpson <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: > It would be very good also if the OP could use one of the many > microsoft.public.platformsdk.* newsgroups. Unless I've missed something, > this has nothing to do with winternals. <obligatory> D'oh! </obligatory> -- ..NET: It's About Trust! http://vfred.mvps.org |
| Back |
| Subject: Re: VC++ 6.0 is not supporting the Platform SDK! |
| Group: microsoft.public.winternals |
| Date: 5/16/2007 6:38:33 AM |
| From: Bert Hyman [Email Address Protection] |
root@127.0.0.1 (Homer J. Simpson) wrote in news:egVqUMzlHHA.4032@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl: >> it would be very good if you could post some of the build errors. >> Notably most fo them are a result of missing includes i think or >> wrong paths or missing linking directories. But it would be very >> good if you could post some detailed compiler/linker errors, so >> that we can tell you the (possible) reasons for them. > > It would be very good also if the OP could use one of the many > microsoft.public.platformsdk.* newsgroups. Unless I've missed > something, this has nothing to do with winternals. I suppose to someone who doesn't follow the news, the group name would be strongly suggestive of one that covered "Windows Internals". The fact that the group only recently appeared would make it particularly noticeable. As Winternals is eventually completely absorbed into Microsoft and no longer has an external identity, the meaning of the group name will become even more obscure. -- Bert Hyman | St. Paul, MN | bert@iphouse.com |
| Back |